Sunday, February 1, 2026

Introducing the Interim Docket Weblog

Share


I’m happy to introduce SCOTUSblog readers to the Interim Docket Blog, the place Will Baude, Dan Epps, I, and certainly others, will touch upon Supreme Courtroom interim orders and associated issues.

An interim order is a non-final judicial determination that determines which occasion’s place controls within the interim between the submitting of a lawsuit and its remaining decision. That sounds boring and technical – and it’s. However interim orders are the place a lot of the motion has been on the Supreme Courtroom this 12 months and for the final decade.

Think about government energy. The court docket has just a few necessary presidential powers circumstances on its deserves docket. Nevertheless it has issued dozens of interim orders this 12 months associated to presidential energy, the overwhelming majority of which the Trump administration has received. (Most of the wins didn’t activate the scope of presidential energy however somewhat dominated that government motion was being challenged within the fallacious venue or by the fallacious plaintiffs; however these rulings have supercharged the administration’s efforts to incapacitate the federal paperwork nonetheless.) 

Interim orders aren’t choices on the deserves. However they are often massively consequential.  Persevering with with the presidency instance, they decide whether or not an government department program can function, or not, in the course of the months or years it takes for remaining decision of a case.  They usually point out the justices’ views of the deserves and thus preview how the case will finally be determined. Generally they resolve a difficulty lastly as a sensible matter.  They usually can exert a magnifying stare decisis affect on decrease federal courts regardless of sometimes containing little or no rationalization.

Briefly, interim orders – particularly however not solely for problems with government energy – have emerged as a observe parallel to deserves choices for the sensible decision of necessary federal questions. But interim orders are usually more durable to know than deserves choices as a result of paucity of rationalization, the technical guidelines that govern their issuance, and their underlying complexity.  

When a plaintiff challenges a presidential government order, for instance, it sometimes seeks an injunction within the district court docket. If the court docket grants the injunction, the federal government sometimes asks the court docket of appeals to “keep” it – that’s, to suspend the order’s enforceability. If the court docket of appeals grants the keep, the plaintiff can ask the Supreme Courtroom to vacate the keep; if it declines to grant it, the federal government might ask the court docket to take action. Many different sequences can happen – for instance, the district court docket denies injunctive aid, the court docket of appeals grants it, and the Supreme Courtroom then stays the injunction.

One intention of this weblog is to make interim orders extra accessible and to situate them within the bigger context of the court docket’s work.

A remaining phrase on terminology. Interim orders are generally known as “emergency” orders. I defined in a latest essay why I believed this was deceptive:

The “emergency” label, which connotes an pressing want for determination, misleads. Candidates generally characterize a request for a keep or injunction as an “emergency.” However usually they don’t. The assessments for granting or vacating a keep or injunction don’t fluctuate relying on how shortly the events declare to wish decision. And the Courtroom is underneath no compulsion to resolve the functions shortly. Generally it does, however usually it takes a very long time.

An instance of the court docket taking its time: The solicitor normal utilized for a keep of the Illinois federal court docket’s Nationwide Guard injunction on Oct. 17. After receiving an preliminary set of responses, Justice Amy Coney Barrett requested a spherical of supplemental briefing on Oct. 29.  That briefing closed on Nov. 17.  And as of this posting, there’s still no decision – although it ought to come any day.

Advisable Quotation:
Jack Goldsmith,
Introducing the Interim Docket Weblog,
SCOTUSblog (Dec. 11, 2025, 9:30 AM),
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/introducing-the-interim-docket-blog/



Source link

Read more

Read More