Regulation Professors
Regulation prof who referred to as for army motion and finish to Israel sues over instructing suspension
The College of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg School of Regulation in July 2022. (Photograph by LawAnalyzer40526, CC-BY-SA-4.0, by way of Wikimedia Commons)
A College of Kentucky legislation professor who has referred to as for army motion in opposition to Israel has filed a lawsuit claiming the college violated his constitutional and civil rights when it suspended him from instructing and launched an investigation to find out whether or not he created a hostile setting.
Tenured legislation professor Ramsi Woodcock alleges the college violated his constitutional rights to freedom of expression and procedural due course of and discriminated in opposition to him in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
Reuters, Inside Higher Ed, the Guardian and Fox News are among the many publications with protection.
In response to the Nov. 13 lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Courtroom for the Japanese District of Kentucky, Woodcock has spoken out “in opposition to Israeli colonialism, apartheid and genocide at tutorial conferences and on legislation school e-mail listservs,” together with via a petition for army motion that he posted on-line. “In his view,” the lawsuit says, Israel “have to be delivered to an finish.”
The lawsuit claims a definition of antisemitism adopted by the Worldwide Holocaust Remembrance Alliance violates the First Modification when utilized by the college in disciplinary proceedings or when utilized in federal enforcement of an anti-discrimination legislation.
“To the extent that the IHRA definition prohibits calling for the dismantling of colonial state constructions, prohibits authorized students from debating the contours of the correct of self-determination, prohibits allegations of race discrimination, and prohibits allegations of genocide, the IHRA definition is unconstitutional,” the swimsuit says.
A joint decision handed by Kentucky lawmakers requires public universities to make use of the definition although it “characterizes broad classes of constitutionally protected speech essential of Israel as antisemitic,” the lawsuit states.
Woodcock has been sharing his views outdoors the classroom since 2024 with out consequence. That modified in the summertime of 2025, the lawsuit says, following passage of the joint decision and federal threats to withdraw funding from universities.
Lawsuit defendants embrace College of Kentucky president Eli Capilouto, legislation dean James Duff and U.S. Training Secretary Linda McMahon.
The lawsuit identifies Woodcock as “a founding father of the inframarginalist motion in legislation and economics, which applies the strategies of legislation and economics to the issue of wealth inequality.” He teaches programs largely within the areas of enterprise and industrial legislation.
He’s represented by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Kapitan Gomaa Regulation and Hawks Quindel, in keeping with a CAIR press release.
College of Kentucky spokesperson Jay Blanton gave statements to a number of publications saying Woodcock had been “reassigned” however not suspended in the course of the investigation.
“If somebody’s views as said threaten the security and well-being of the college’s college students and workers, we’re obligated to behave to guard our neighborhood and our individuals,” Blanton instructed the Guardian. “That’s clear underneath Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. We’ve an obligation to seek out out if that’s the case.”
Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.
