Saturday, October 25, 2025

‘No Kings’ Protesters Reject Political Violence, Survey Reveals

Share


U.S. Protesters More and more Reject Political Violence, ‘No Kings’ Survey Finds

Huge marches nationwide within the U.S. marked a flip towards an growing acceptance of political violence amongst protesters, report sociologists

A large crowd marching along a street with the Capitol dome looming in the background.

Protestors march alongside Pennsylvania Avenue throughout the second “No Kings” protest on October 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Nathan Howard/Getty Photographs

The newest “No Kings” marches throughout the U.S. marked a pointy flip away from protesters’ acceptance of political violence, suggests one early survey by sociologists.

Hundreds of thousands of individuals nationwide marched on Saturday in protests of Trump administration strikes they see as undermining democracy. In an early survey, sociologists discovered that 59 p.c of protesters in Washington D.C. reported disagreement with political violence, in a flip from related surveys at earlier protests.

Stacked bar chart shows the percentage of participants in each of four 2025 protests who responded “agree,” “disagree” or “neither agree nor disagree” to the statement “Because things have gotten so far off track, Americans may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.”

Amanda Montañez; Supply: Dana Fisher and Arman Azedi (information)


On supporting science journalism

When you’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you’re serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.


Marchers there have been “radically much less supportive of political violence” than these beforehand surveyed, says sociologist Dana Fisher of American College, whose workforce has surveyed 4 massive protests since January. “We additionally noticed fewer violent indicators and plenty of extra individuals in costume.”

Led by Fisher and her American College colleague, Arman Azedi, a workforce outfitted with laptop tablets and QR codes surveyed 348 marchers within the Washington, D.C., protest, which drew maybe more than 200,000 people. In June on the No Kings protest in Philadelphia, as many as 40 p.c of marchers agreed that “People might must resort to violence in an effort to save our nation,” the workforce had discovered. However on Saturday within the nation’s capital, solely 23 p.c agreed.

Whereas the survey outcomes are actually recent off the tablets of scientists, the shift is price noting, Fisher says. “My preliminary interpretation is the change in opinion is in response to the current assassinations” that had been politically motivated, she says, together with headlines about violent acts committed by federal agents transferring into cities. As well as, march organizers emphasised peaceable protest forward of the occasion.

Additionally forward of the march, administration officers warned of “left-wing violence” related to protests. However the Related Press described the Saturday occasions as a nonviolent “street party” of marching bands, costumes and banners. A Harvard Kennedy School report launched final week discovered that anti-Trump protests have unfold extra deeply into areas of the U.S. the place a majority of individuals voted for Donald Trump in 2024.

“We’re nonetheless not seeing the scholars becoming a member of these crowds,” says Fisher, who emphasised that extra surveys of protests are wanted to verify substantive modifications in U.S. public opinion. Although the survey discovered extra younger individuals amongst marchers in comparison with previous ones, the bulk had been feminine, extremely educated, white

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

When you loved this text, I’d prefer to ask to your help. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and business for 180 years, and proper now could be the most important second in that two-century historical past.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I used to be 12 years outdated, and it helped form the way in which I have a look at the world. SciAm at all times educates and delights me, and conjures up a way of awe for our huge, stunning universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

When you subscribe to Scientific American, you assist be certain that our protection is centered on significant analysis and discovery; that now we have the sources to report on the selections that threaten labs throughout the U.S.; and that we help each budding and dealing scientists at a time when the worth of science itself too typically goes unrecognized.

In return, you get important information, captivating podcasts, sensible infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch movies, challenging games, and the science world’s greatest writing and reporting. You possibly can even gift someone a subscription.

There has by no means been a extra essential time for us to face up and present why science issues. I hope you’ll help us in that mission.



Source link

Read more

Read More