Monday, February 2, 2026

Consent would not finish with conception

Share



Consent would not finish with conception

By Angela B. Ryan

Earlier than I used to be pregnant, I judged colleagues who have been. In the event that they arrived late to court docket, seemed raveled, or weren’t as sharp as I used to be, I assumed, “Pull it collectively. Girls’s our bodies have been ‘designed for it,’ weren’t they?” I cringe now, however I admit it: I rolled my eyes. I used to be ignorant. Then I bought pregnant.

Not as soon as, not twice, however 3 times—in lower than 4 years. I spent 27 months whole as a pregnant working lawyer. Instantly I used to be not the important observer. I used to be the physique underneath inspection, and I discovered, to my horror, that my physique had develop into a commodity.

The courtroom stroke

Once I practiced regulation and was not pregnant, I obtained the occasional praise on a gown or a bag—nothing memorable, nothing uncommon. So, I used to be unprepared after I first began displaying, and all of the sudden, my look was fodder for courtroom dialogue. Judges referred to as me “cute,” and court docket criers talked at size about my “cute” stomach. Colleagues stated I used to be “glowing,” or just, “You look superb!” As if showing put collectively was an sudden shock.

Earlier than one notably contested listening to, opposing counsel reached throughout the desk and stroked my abdomen in entrance of the decide. He touched, he rubbed, he “thought he felt a kick!” He wasn’t being form; he was performing. The courtroom laughed. My autonomy disappeared.

And right here’s the irony: I by no means misplaced a listening to whereas visibly pregnant. I’ve given this a number of thought, and it was positively not as a result of I used to be at my sharpest—I used to be nauseous, exhausted, typically barely holding on. I feel it was the worry of emotional lability related to “the pregnant lady,” or unconscious warning to not “upset” somebody in a medically fragile state. Nobody needed to be the decide who made an eight-month-pregnant lawyer cry in court docket. Being pregnant itself turned my most persuasive exhibit. The benefit wasn’t rooted in benefit however in spectacle. And the associated fee was my autonomy.

The Stroke, the Rub, the Rib Rub

It was a stroke not of luck, however of assault.

A stroke of the hand throughout my stomach, in chambers, in public, in court docket. A stroke of my autonomy, a stroke too far.

Some name it the Rub—as if a softer phrase makes it much less grotesque. The Rub. Like a therapeutic massage. Like a joke. Like a barbecue advert. However it wasn’t pleasant. It was colleagues, strangers, even opposing counsel laying declare to my physique via my gown, my skirt, my swimsuit—whereas I stood silent.

One buddy referred to as it the Rib Rub. Possibly that’s essentially the most correct, as a result of it was precisely as uncomfortable because it sounds. Humorous once you say it out loud, however invasive when it occurred.

That’s the facility of language. Stroke, rub, pat—euphemisms we use to sanitize what it truly is: assault. And once you wrap assault in a phrase that sounds cozy, folks cease seeing it. They cease naming it. They cease defending you from it.

Although its title differs from lady to lady—the Stroke, the Rub, the Pat, the Stomach Contact—what’s common is our hatred of it. We don’t snort as a result of it’s humorous. We snort as a result of it’s absurd, as a result of it’s sanctioned, as a result of we now have no alternative however to swallow the trend. However beneath? All of us hate it. Each single one among us.

An expert blind spot

In another context, stroking a colleague’s physique in chambers or in court docket can be acknowledged as harassment. Our career calls for extra—we maintain ourselves to requirements that require avoiding not solely impropriety, however even the looks of impropriety. A lawyer stroking the stomach of a pregnant colleague in court docket, or a decide permitting it, is improper by any measure.

The regulation already acknowledges this. The Being pregnant Discrimination Act of 1978 amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to ban discrimination “due to being pregnant, childbirth or associated medical situations.” And the Equal Employment Alternative Fee has made clear that harassment primarily based on being pregnant—together with unwelcome bodily conduct—can represent illegal intercourse discrimination. But in apply, the stomach stroke isn’t addressed.

Anthropologists name being pregnant a “liminal state”—seen, symbolic, reframed as public property. Sociologists discover that undesirable stomach touching is among the few types of assault ladies describe as publicly sanctioned. Public well being analysis exhibits that stress hormones triggered by violation don’t simply have an effect on moms; they have an effect on infants. This isn’t etiquette. It’s a office tradition downside, a professionalism downside and a public well being downside rolled into one.

The memo to the bar

What are we doing? You wouldn’t stroke a colleague’s arm in court docket. You wouldn’t stroke a stranger’s new child with out permission. And but you’ll be able to stroke the unborn via the mom’s physique, whereas everybody else smiles? That is lunacy. It should finish.

Right here’s the memo I need despatched:

SUBJECT: STOP TOUCHING PREGNANT WOMEN!!!

BODY: Don’t contact a pregnant individual with out specific consent. Interval.

It’s small. It’s rapid. It’s enforceable. Practice courthouse workers. Add it to HR manuals. Educate judges. Write it into office harassment insurance policies. Put it in orientation binders. One line: Don’t contact.

Closing argument

I’m writing from the opposite facet. I survived 27 months of sanctioned strokes. I’m, in that sense, an assault survivor—not within the cinematic sense, however in the true one: My physique was touched with out consent, in entrance of colleagues and judges, whereas everybody smiled.

I confess my ignorance within the methods I considered pregnant ladies within the office earlier than I turned one. I judged, and I wasn’t simply unfair, I used to be mistaken. There is no such thing as a one worthy of extra admiration within the office than the pregnant lady—displaying up in discomfort, in ache, usually with out sleep and at all times with out sufficient snacks. I’m ashamed of my prior ignorance. However I’m additionally offended at a mistaken unchecked, which I now see so clearly. And, partially in penance for my former ignorance, I’m right here to set the file straight.

Being pregnant is difficult. Consent doesn’t finish with conception. We have to do higher. The authorized career ought to make overt, specific makes an attempt to redress this situation—in coverage, in coaching and in tradition.

We will debate pressured births, reproductive rights and the larger battles one other day. For now, repair this smaller one. Abolish the Stroke. Abolish the Rub. Abolish the Rib Rub. No matter you name it, cease touching pregnant ladies with out consent. And sure, that features ladies stroking different ladies’s bellies. Preserve your arms to yourselves.

As a result of it was by no means candy. It was by no means glowing. It was by no means your proper.

It was assault. And it was a stroke too far.


Angela B. Ryan is a lawyer, a mom of 4 and a former adjunct regulation professor at Villanova College, the place she taught about youngsters and the regulation. She writes in regards to the intersection of regulation, motherhood {and professional} tradition.


ABAJournal.com is accepting queries for unique, considerate, nonpromotional articles and commentary by unpaid contributors to run within the Your Voice part. Particulars and submission pointers are posted at “Your Submissions, Your Voice.”






Source link

Read more

Read More