We haven’t had a movie evaluation on SCOTUSblog for fairly a while now. Provided that, we figured Bloomberg Legislation’s “Supreme Advocacy: What It Takes to Argue on the Supreme Courtroom,” was the right candidate. The 40-minute documentary, directed by Andrew Satter, follows Supreme Courtroom litigator Roman Martinez, a Latham & Watkins associate who has argued 16 cases in entrance of the justices.
Particularly, the movie follows Martinez as he prepares for and argues the case of A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, which the court docket heard again in April. In that case, Martinez led an appellate workforce on behalf of Ava Tharpe, a teenage woman with extreme epilepsy whose mother and father challenged the scope of her academic lodging below federal incapacity discrimination legal guidelines.
Like another Supreme Courtroom documentaries (a la “RBG”) the movie is laudatory of its star. But it surely principally highlights the advocacy course of. Within the words of movie director Andrew Satter: “I believe numerous documentaries concerning the Supreme Courtroom normally deal with a difficulty or an individual. We actually wished to inform a narrative concerning the course of, about how this works.”
The movie opens with a black and white b-roll of a gavel being struck. Some seconds in, we swap to demonstrators outdoors the court docket with indicators from “shield trans youth” to “intercourse change is a fantasy” and “bans off our our bodies” to “abortion is homicide.” “You possibly can hardly consider a topic that issues to you as a person that may by no means come earlier than the supreme court docket,” says reporter Nina Totenberg.
The documentary then pivots to Martinez himself, a particularly likable and down-to-earth litigator with the “pedigree you’d count on from an elite lawyer.” We find out about his Yale Legislation College training, his clerkship for Chief Justice John Roberts (full with a framed picture and a heat inscription from Roberts), and Martinez’s time within the U.S. solicitor common’s workplace. Disappointingly, the movie glosses over a few of the most attention-grabbing facets of Martinez’s background, like his role serving as an advisor on the Iraqi structure or the substance of the 14 Supreme Courtroom arguments earlier than A.J.T. A sketch from Martinez’s highest-profile case, Relentless v. Department of Commerce (through which the Supreme Courtroom overruled a longstanding doctrine on deference to administrative companies) seems briefly, alongside a quote from Martinez praising the consequence as “a win for particular person liberty and the Structure.” But the documentary doesn’t delve into how such experiences knowledgeable his technique in A.J.T.
A.J.T. itself is launched by way of a Star Tribune headline about Ava’s household difficult the Osseo college district after their 2015 transfer from Kentucky to Minnesota, the place the district refused to undertake her individualized training program and slashed her lodging. House movies of Ava’s seizures and her mother and father’ testimony – Gina and Aaron Tharpe describe how she misplaced her potential to speak – additionally carry house the case’s private stakes.
Bloomberg Legislation reporter Kimberly Robinson notes that lots of the instances that make their approach to the Supreme Courtroom achieve this as a result of the federal courts of appeals have reached completely different conclusions about the identical authorized challenge. In A.J.T., nonetheless, the decrease courts agreed on the damages for intentional discrimination however disagreed on what households like Ava’s should show to point out intent.
That is the place the movie’s emphasis on course of shines. A clear timeline graphic traces the case from the household’s petition for evaluation (filed after the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the eighth Circuit dominated in opposition to Ava) to the grant of this petition, briefing earlier than the court docket, and oral argument. We see Martinez’s workforce dividing analysis, enhancing drafts 20-30 occasions, and navigating amicus (“pal of the court docket”) briefs – together with a supportive one from the U.S. authorities.
However, whereas I appreciated all of the footage of Martinez working late (usually with a glowing water can in body, as Sarah Isgur noted on a current AO episode), the documentary doesn’t do a a lot deeper authorized dive. We don’t actually get any sense of how issues performed out within the decrease courts or the nuances of the authorized commonplace really in play – the intent requirement at challenge will get a passing nod however no actual dialogue. Slightly, we get fundamentals just like the three branches of presidency, and different Schoolhouse Rock-like explanations that may already be acquainted for anybody with a passing curiosity in civics.
So again to Martinez, the place the movie is at its finest. We find out about his Cuban heritage (his father fled the revolution, his uncle was a Miami prosecutor), his household life within the D.C. suburb of Chevy Chase – full with an “Sincere Lawyer” pillow – and the way he met his spouse when she was a summer season affiliate at one other agency. A cute scene exhibits him bringing his daughter to the workplace, and we get a way of Martinez’s pre-argument rituals (no all-nighters, not like regulation college). The movie additionally touches on his evolution as an advocate, and Martinez displays on getting snug with the justices. (One factor missed: the movie briefly exhibits a photograph of Justice Brett Kavanaugh with Martinez’s youngsters, however the truth that Martinez clerked for this justice when Kavanaugh was a choose is just about overlooked.)
After the argument, the documentary captures Martinez’s cautious optimism and the look ahead to determination day, exhibiting him refreshing the Supreme Courtroom web site similar to the remainder of us. This in the end resulted in a 9-0 win – and it’s pleasant to observe Martinez announce that they gained on a name together with his workforce and the Tharpes. But it surely’s all a bit too simplistic: from early on, Martinez is fervently portrayed as the great man, with every little thing lowered to a easy “hero’s journey” through which all of the items align and the regulation’s precise nuances are left unexplored.
After which, in fact, is the oral argument itself. The movie units the scene of the courtroom pretty nicely (for instance, noting things like the 94-inch diagonal distance between the advocate and the justices). There are additionally a number of clips that seize some key moments, together with an accusation by Lisa Blatt, who represented the college district, that Martinez and the federal government had lied in asserting that she had modified her place – which Martinez later states they’ve “moved previous.” However, once more, the movie doesn’t make clear lots of the points really raised by the justices, or delve into what these should do with the arguments being made. Issues are saved floor degree, which can be irritating to anybody (not simply SCOTUS aficionados) trying to perceive what, precisely, is happening right here.
In the long run, “Supreme Advocacy” excels on fashion, and viewers will admire its behind-the-scenes entry and Martinez’s extraordinarily likeable nature. It additionally weaves in some humor (a rest room flush heard whereas Martinez was arguing over the phone in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to former U.S. Solicitor Basic Elizabeth Prelogar’s penchant for consuming a number of bananas earlier than an argument) amid the intense points at stake. But it surely’s slightly subpar on substance, treating the viewers like they’ll’t deal with the “why” behind the wins.
Posted in Featured, Film Review
